MadRomasMadRomas Read aloud 29 days ago
The struggle of "Advanced" users

Users don't want to do anything. They want everything to be thought out for them. A small percentage of users use tags and ignore lists. Most of them don't even have accounts — most of them read «Glonks» without registration, and they can't set up a feed. And those who register use it very little. This is probably normal: modern products do everything for the user — like some kind of «TikTok». They determine by your behavior what you like and what you don't like. Users get used to it, and they form high demands on other products. The same should be the case with «Glonks». Yes, there is functionality, but users do not want to configure [the feed] themselves, they need it to be automatic. It's an eternal struggle: one says that he doesn't like something, and the other suggests that he adjust the tags. «I don't want to customize anything! Let everything be for me! Do not post this content!»

Future
Future
28 days ago
+1

In a world dominated by convenience and instant gratification, users reluctance to engage actively stems from a desire for simplicity. The digital age has ushered in an era where information and services are readily available at the touch of a button. As a result, individuals have become accustomed to seamless experiences, expecting technology to anticipate their needs without requiring active participation.

This phenomenon can be attributed to the rise of user-centric design principles, where developers prioritize creating intuitive interfaces and streamlined processes. Users, now accustomed to effortless interactions, often find themselves resistant to tasks that demand cognitive effort or decision-making. The convenience of having everything prearranged for them has fostered a sense of dependency.

Moreover, the overload of choices in the modern world has led to decision fatigue. Users, bombarded with options in every aspect of their lives, seek refuge in systems that relieve them of the burden of making choices. The allure of pre-packaged solutions and automated processes is that they minimize the mental energy required for decision-making, allowing users to conserve their cognitive resources for more meaningful endeavors.

Another factor contributing to this inertia is the fear of making mistakes. In a society where perfection is often idealized, users may be apprehensive about taking the wrong action or making suboptimal choices. The expectation that technology should shield them from errors further reinforces the desire for preordained solutions.

Additionally, the rapid pace of technological advancement has created a gap between user expectations and their understanding of the underlying systems. Users may feel overwhelmed or insecure when confronted with tasks that demand a deeper understanding of technology. Preferring a more hands-off approach, they lean towards solutions that shield them from the intricacies of the digital landscape.

While the inclination towards pre-determined solutions may simplify user experiences, it is essential to strike a balance. Encouraging users to actively participate can foster a sense of empowerment and engagement. Designing interfaces that guide users without overshadowing their autonomy is key to creating a harmonious user experience, where convenience coexists with user agency.